Trump v Biden – is the Last Man In?
Category: Political
The Pilgrim’s Progressing!
https://vk.com/wall594296724_6299
Typically, the ‘impartial’ UK press is criticising DJT for refusing ‘to go quietly’. I wonder what they’d report if the boot was on the other leg?
Dead donkeys can’t count!
https://vk.com/wall594301441_10924
As the New World media start to pump out their bilge, truth must remain the sharpest scalpel. The old world order was built on rock, not slime..
Truth – the sharpest scalpel!
If the online activity of the past four years is to be trusted, there is no doubt that President Donald J Trump has been consistently ruffling a lot of democratic feathers across the pond. Well, what did they expect, when the nation voted in a business man rather than a politician? Right from the day he declared that he wanted to “go see Rocket-Man” I could see that we were going to be in for something special.
Today, we have confirmation from a Dr Steve Pieczenik, who has been authorized to make a public statement, confirming what was circulating last week, that there have been serious shenanigans going on at the polling stations running up to the election on November 3rd across the USA. There can surely be no clearer announcement than this, that evidence is appearing which will send many people to jail for their part in this democrat fiasco. Please see the attached video, issued on Friday 6th November 2020
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/trump-039-s-election-sting-operation_Os7C58T3KerszWo.html
It seems that there is a g-d in heaven after all..
Specialists – in generalising?
Re-posted with a hat-tip to ‘The Slog’
“Vallance and Whitty’s ordeal at the hands of the Science and Technology sub-committee may have seemed to the untrained eye like a dull affair, but it was riddled with clear evidence of contradiction and amateurism.
Both men were forced to accept some startling things. Whether many of our MPs will spot them is another matter, but I at least shall record them here.
The most remarkable fact to emerge was what both witnesses agreed was “the very low level of infection transmitted outdoors”. The answer was given in response to a question about inter-school football games being cancelled; but the ramifications of it are mind-blowing.
One of the very few things I have accepted since the February 2020 period about Covid19 is that is has been billed by almost all experts as ‘fifteen times more infectious than influenza‘.
Are these self-styled science-promoters now telling us that this is wrong? And if outdoors is not the main source of infection, then research does indeed suggest that the only other place is indoors.
So why are we being locked down in the one environment where (it now seems) Covid spreads with consummate ease?
Another breathtaking admission came from Sir Mark Vallance a few minutes minutes later, when he said, “we don’t actually know the NHS’s bed capacity, because that is their modelling copyright”. Yet these are the team leaders who gave the media earlier this week an exact date – December 4th – when the NHS would ‘run out of bed capacity’. So how on earth could they know that?
I saw little evidence of any reputation-seeking legislator pressing the Dubious Duo on either of these points.
Vallance came across as far more dismissive of attacks based on what he seemed to see as low-level detail. He observed, “Look, we’re not being asked to know every stat on outdoor tranmission” and Whitty nodded, adding “Scientific investigation is not a yes-no thing”.
Well guys, trust me: ‘Full up by December 4th” is a yes-no thing.
Meanwhile, Chris Whitty made several attempts to excuse himself on the basis of modelling being an inexact science….and sound almost humble in his realisation of model shortcomings. In doing so, he managed only to come across as casual – even sloppy – in his use of the words ‘might’, ‘could’, ‘theoretically’, ‘imponderables’ and ‘likelihoods’.
What these two very senior advisers are in the business of doing is making futurology look and sound like science. In fact – certainly based on my own professional experience of models – it’s quackery.
Sir Mark Vallance really gave the game away by saying, “What five organisations have done is model outcomes against a series of assumptions”.
All of them gave a different answer – imagine that? – and thus, they took a mean number. Presenting this as a bona fide conclusion is not science in any shape or form: it’s an illusionist’s card trick.
The fundamental weakness of models is the flaw in one or more of their assumptions. It’s why all the climate models are wrong, and why Neil Ferguson has been so wildly wrong four times in a row over eighteen years….and has cost the country some £28 billion.
The ham-fisted alchemy of it all went on and on. Sir Mark conceded that the models didn’t factor in all of the data about the new 3-tiered system – a system he and his colleagues dismissed at the time as “woefully insufficient” – but which today Chris Whitty was forced to accept may well have had a positive effect.
Whitty blithely went on to tell committee members (via absurd video-distancing links) that “reaching the peak which we reached in April strikes me as an entirely realistic situation” for the new models to project. Nobody asked the question how he could say that, given the titanic difference in alleged Co-Vid 19 death levels between September/October and the March/April period.
In truth, all the hearings did was confirm what somewhere between 14 and 18% of us have felt since the outset of Contrick19: as a subject of risible hype, it remains unequalled in the annals of historical attempts to churn out nonsense apart from (perhaps) the Rastafarian drivel insisting during the 1970s that Haile Selassi would live forever.
The wooden Coronavirus narrative is riddled with the worm of cognitive dissonance, of “facts” changing from week to week, of counterintuitive insistence, and the blasé rejection of everything we have ever learned about natural resistance.
The simplest example of this is The Mask. See if you can keep a straight face as I unveil a simple piece of logic on the basis of “you can’t have it every which way at once”.
“Masks don’t protect you much” >> “Masks are vital if you want to protect yourself outdoors” >> “Masks work” >> “Most infection doesn’t take place outdoors” >> “If you’re vulnerable, stay at home because Masks alone aren’t enough to protect you”.
Let’s wait and see what Parliament makes of the ‘evidence’ we heard today. Just don’t get your hopes up.
Defend your Constitutional Rights
There is a rally planned for this coming Saturday, 7th November 2020, to be held in HULL city centre commencing 12 noon. If you value your constitution and the precious rights which it gives us, you will be there.
Genuflecting?
The good ship ‘Britannia’ has been boarded by pirates whose aim is to plunder her before scuttling her..
Weh dem, der aus der Reihe tanzt**!
How many of us knew that Obergruppenfuehrerin Merkel was actually born Victoria Kastner – in the USA? Nothing these days is ever quite what it appears to be at first glance.
In truth, I am less interested in her than I am in the New World (Dis)Order of which she is just one of the many pawns on the board. What to do about it all?
We now have a police service more interested in what we British sheeple are thinking, rather than concentrating on their historical (since Sir Robert Peel – 1829) role, viz:
“The primary object of an efficient police is the preservation of life and property and the prevention of crime”
The primary object of today’s police is now bordering on the Orwellian Room 101 (if you don’t comply we’ll let rats eat out your eyes) mindset.
All of us, uninvited immigrants, as well as polite septuagenarians who can remember Ration Books, are walking around with coinage in our pocket, every piece carrying the image of our Sovereign Lady, plus the pledge, which she made, back in 1952,
Dei Gratia (D,.G.) by the grace of g-d (let’s not offend anyone here)
Fidei Defensor (F.D.) – defender of the Faith – the right to believe, (if you find that easier)
yet we hear that it is ‘offensive’ or ‘inciteful of racial tension’ should a follower of the resurrected Messiah (= R.C. – Jesus) dare to stand on a public street and read aloud from his Bible. However, if you are an Islamite, it is tolerated that you go around randomly stabbing people, whilst screaming out that ‘Allah is the greatest’ – just because we don’t happen to share the same view of g-d as the Prophet would have it.
Either way, Jo and Joe Public are now being straight-jacketed, told what to think, what to say, where (and where not) to say it, all against a backdrop of egotistical Tory treason, where the only place in which Democracy survives intact is – the Cabinet Room.
Here is today’s example, (with a hat-tip to the DFLA) and published online, thanks to the courage and determination of the editors at Kipper Central..
Editors Note: Facebook have continually censored this post.
“I guess, like me, you will have heard of the case involving Tommy Robinson. Not just Tommy of course, R B Inman, Darrell Goodliffe etc who have all had their Facebook pages taken down.
Other groups have also been taken down. It seems we are entering into a new a dark era in the history of our country.
The darkness is that of the Silencing of speech, the Silencing of communication. There is a reason behind this.
THE WAR IS DECLARED AND BATTLE HAS COME DOWN.
This has been a peculiar week for those of us involved in the struggle to keep our nation afloat. (This is not an elitist article, if you are reading this you are involved in that struggle and I count you as a fellow soldier.)
From the Labour Party and Corbyn announcing he is wanting a second referendum to the formation of an undemocratic political party in the Houses of Parliament. (Did anyone vote this new party into place?) From worrying signals of Brexit not being carried through to the exposè of the criminals behind Panorama to the closing down of TR and company on FB and Twitter, something tells me they are all linked.
TAKE OFF THE HEAD THE BODY WILL DIE.
For me this is textbook tactics taking place. Those who have military experience will understand straight away.
If you go to war you can paralyse the enemy effectively by taking out the leaders, then communications. The enemy can then be dealt with in a piecemeal fashion.
Are we seeing this happen as we speak? Leaders taken out, groups taken down. There can be no denying that this has happened. The question is why. Why now, when there are ominous warnings about Brexit, when our government are turning their back on the people, when the EU are insulting the English people in ever growing malice.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ESSENTIAL.
Communication is the key to any idea, to any movement. If you stop people communicating you have a free ride and can rule in peace.
Over the years we have seen politicians clamp down on free speech. They have done this in many ways: Sexism, racism, hate crime, hate speech, Islamophobic, homophobia, femophobia political correctness. Then when Facebook came along, it all went on line. People thought they could speak freely. Not a bit of it. Cyber police, online crime hub, censorship.
Just why is it if I say something on line I get the police doing a raid (Trust me, 12 coppers at 6am for me saying that Corbyn and Fascism are the same and quoting a speech from Hitler to prove it) when 20 miles down the road over 200 girls under 16 are being raped by Muslim rape Gangs and nothing is done.
You explain.
No, the facts are there. Freedom of speech is being removed.
WHY REMOVE THE RIGHT?
Throughout history freedom of speech has been an essential part of any race and its development. Freedom of speech has been the prerequisite of all idea and expression. Without freedom of speech there would be no art, no music, no film, no Facebook, no pyramids, no Eiffel Tower, no London Bridge, Stonehenge, football, cricket, theory of evolution. You name anything and it only became possible through freedom of speech.
Without freedom of speech there would be no moon landings, no flight, no science, philosophy, exploration, cures in medicine, romance, drama, all would be gone.
According to Liberties International, “Some EU governments are not respecting freedom of speech. Some of them put pressure on public service media to report in a way that is biased in favour of the government.”
You want to tell me the BBC or Facebook are not undergoing this pressure?
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ESSENTIAL
Without freedom of speech there can be no functioning of society, there can be no democracy. Galile Galileo was placed under house arrest and described as an insane heretic in his day. Yet now he is considered the father between philosophy and Modern science. There are many cases of this nature, from Martin Luther King who challenged and threatened the modern society of his time. Can you imagine if America had treated him the way our Government and media treat Tommy Robinson?
Imagine everything that we would miss out on, the years it would have set us back in terms of progression?
I am no direct fan of Tommy Robinson. I respect the guy and admire his courage but it is plain to see that if you criticise the religion of Islam you are labeled as a racist or Islamophobe, there is no middle ground. Indeed people have died at the hands of the followers of this religion for being critical.
Any views that challenge the current political stranglehold are not allowed and you will instantly be shouted down and again labeled as racist etc…… Say anything that contradicts Labour or Conservative or that is critical of the system and again you are right wing.
Your words are watched daily, your actions monitored on CCTV. You are only one step away from being locked up.
Criticise Khan on crime, you are racist, criticise Muslim rape gangs, you are racist.
Your opponents cannot debate, they cannot rationalise, they merely shout and use slogans, why?
Because they have lost the ability to use freedom of speech.
When we lose the ability to debate, we lose the ability to reason and thus the ability to use free speech.
LOSE FREEDOM OF SPEECH YOU RETARD SOCIETY.
It is only too obvious that society as a whole, can only function when allowed to practice freedom of speech.
Now Freedom of speech does not give you the right to insult. As Plato stated: “When one resorts to insults one had lost the debate already”
This is something I agree with. However When speaking out against politics or religion, are you insulting an individual or the political belief?
An insult on a belief is not a personal insult, I wish people could tell the difference! In today’s society they cannot. They do not get the logic of debate or the understanding of cut and thrust in debate.
If we take today’s society and apply its logic what would we have?
Well based on Tommy Robinson Lenin would be called a racist: “Religion is the opiate of the masses”
Well that is hate speech. Saying that Islam is a drug that enslaves people and will kill them is hateful and Islamophobic.
But no, What Lenin said is OK, as long as you apply it to Christianity.
Karl Marx said that mankind will only be free when it emancipates itself from the jew.
(Hitler called this final solution).
This is hate speech. Yet millions follow this line of thinking.
Jeremy Corbyn who gave money to a holocaust denier, friends with Hamas etc…. Well, he has not got into trouble has he?
MAY YOU LIVE IN INTERESTING TIMES.
This is a Chinese curse. It is always the interesting times that cause the most difficult lives in history.
In a week where a black Christian preacher was arrested but Muslims praying on London Bridge (Scene of a violent terrorist attack) were not arrested at all despite seizing up traffic. In a week where a political party is formed to go against the Democratic rights of the people, in a week where Corbyn calls for a second referendum, we have the UKIP activists shut down on Facebook.
On a week that Tommy Robinson smashes the BBC in public and blatantly calls them liars Facebook closes down his account and several Facebook people and groups pages.
When did Facebook sell out and become the informant for the Government?
You have the right to be worried. You have the right to take action.
Take action or take slavery.
Your choice.” end quote.
There is a pressing need for fewer ego-trips and greater unity of purpose; which is why we offer, via ‘cpr4d@livingstones.uk’ a rallying point for all of us, as this oppression continues to escalate. A way forward DOES present itself; it will take more of that courage and determination, but the time is near when you will be arrested…
** translation ‘ “Woe unto him that steppeth out of line!”
Thank you, Stephen Place
As an ex rank and file copper who has policed the streets I am now the biggest and loudest advocate for Police Officers throughout the country. Their job, it could be argued with empirical evidence by the bucket load, has never ever been more dangerous nor so poorly supported by both government and public alike.
Yesterday though [Sunday 24th Feb], we saw two Police Officers who, by virtue of a video, appear to have crossed the line of professionalism and may have just acted beyond their legal remit.
An elderly looking man was preaching in London on the road side. Two officers approach and claim they have had a report that this gentleman, Bible in hand has been ‘Islamaphobic’. Now, due to the video beginning when the officers arrive, it cannot be established whether or not he had uttered anything Islamaphobic. One can only hope they have a written statement or some other evidence to prove the allegation.
A verbal altercation takes place and then the police officers grab the man and take his Bible. The man is heard pleading for the officers not to take his bible, the more aggressive of the two is heard to say “You should have thought about that before you decided to be racist”. I have not heard him utter anything racist whilst talking to them. They therefore have a report via telephone to suggest he has.
They say he has disturbed the Queens peace. They arrest him for this, handcuff him and take him away.
Several things come out of this action, not least is the ‘direct correlation’ between Christianity and Islam, and the way the Police, especially in London, prosecute the law which appertains to these ‘religions’.
There are many incidents of Muslims praying in the road stopping traffic and also at Speakers Corner in Hyde Park. Both are criminal offences and neither of these are prosecuted.
Public gatherings which demonstrate against the building of large mosques in many towns are heavily policed. Marches by Muslims calling for the death of our serving soldiers, and calling for those whose corpses being returned in coffins via Brize Norton to ‘burn in hell’ are not prosecuted.
Those who take part in marches, demonstrations and rallies, flying the proscribed ISIS flag – are not prosecuted. However, those carrying the Union Jack in public at events such as the Durham Miners Gala – are stopped and told to take the flag away.
Never before have we witnessed these double standards being applied by the UK Police when it comes to religious public displays than what took place today.
I hope the chap gets his Bible back and is let out of the station with no charge. I hope that the officers look at the video doing the rounds of social media and reflect on their actions.
With a grateful ‘hat-tip’ to Stephen Place; there aren’t many prepared to tell it like it is
‘BREXIT – An appeal to the ‘Remainers’
The Present Situation The British government has all but failed to fulfil the decision of the British people that the United Kingdom should be taken out of the European Union (aka Brexit). Under the Article 50 process we now have just 50 working days (even fewer Parliament-days, I believe) until the date on which the UK must, by law, leave the EU, that is 29th March 2019. Our constitutional and political systems are in chaos and nobody has the first idea of the terms under which the UK will leave the EU – known as the Withdrawal Agreement; a sort of ‘divorce’ settlement. The default position is that if there is no Withdrawal Agreement then, as far as trade between the UK and EU countries is concerned, we shift to World Trade Organisation rules. In all other respects, the UK will no longer be a member of the European Union. Like one of those scenes in a ‘Mission Impossible’ movie, where the screen is filled with a big, red LCD timer counting down, and you’re biting your nails to know if Tom Cruise will defuse the nuclear weapon in time, we’re all wondering what will happen on 29 March. Will the UK leave the EU with a deal? Will the UK ‘crash out’ of the EU with no deal? Will somebody pause the clock (extend the Article 50 process)? Will somebody stop the clock (terminate the Article 50 process altogether)? Nobody knows – which is an extraordinary failure of government and politics when you think about it. The EU Referendum June 2016 Sad perhaps, but I had spent seven years before the EU Referendum of June 2016 teaching myself about the history, culture, workings and ambitions of the European Union. I did so after reading a book in 2009 written by Matthew Elliot, the Co-Founder and then Chief Executive of the Taxpayers’ Alliance (of which I’m a member); the book was entitled ‘The Great European Rip-Off: How the Corrupt, Wasteful EU is Taking Control of Our Lives‘. I finished the book and was horrified. I resolved to find out as much as I could from multiple sources about the EU. The more I researched, the more horrified I became. Marta Andreasen’s ‘Brussels Laid Bare‘ made me shudder, but probably the definitive work on the story of the European Union is a book written and published in 2003 by Christopher Booker and Richard North entitled, ‘The Great Deception: Can the European Union Survive?‘ I read all 615 pages of this tome and by the end of it had decided that not only was the European Union a pernicious political construct, but also likely eventually – and ironically – to become the cause of the next serious conflict in mainland Europe. I realised that the European Union was not some kind of benign ‘group-hug’ which existed for the pursuit of children’s happiness, animal welfare and world peace; rather, my research told me that the European Union was in fact the mother-of-all rackets, heavily disguised and cleverly promoted as Nirvana. It won’t surprise you to learn, therefore, that come the EU Referendum, I voted Leave. The Power of the European Union The impressive thing about the European Union is that over a generation or so it has seduced member nations through their ruling political and societal elites, establishment institutions, academia, press and media organisations, big business and so on into believing that ceding national sovereignty is synonymous with prosperity. The originators of the European Union founded the institution on the basis that if you play on people’s economic hopes and fears, you can do pretty much as you like with them politically. We shouldn’t have been surprised, therefore, that the thrust of the Remain campaign in the EU Referendum was not to espouse the untold cultural, political and societal benefits of EU membership, but rather to argue that leaving the European Union would result in economic ruin. Indeed, even now as we approach the 29 March, the British government, the political class, the BBC and much of the mainstream media, big business, Uncle Tom Cobbley and All are telling us that without a Brexit-In-Name-Only (BRINO) Withdrawal Agreement, the United Kingdom is without doubt doomed. Such is the power of the European Union marketing machine; such is its hold on our society after 40-odd years of subservience to its political and legal institutions. Please don’t accuse me of making biased, unfounded assertions here, by the way. Just spend a few years like I did studying the history and workings of the EU for yourself. What Next? A couple of years ago, naively perhaps, I thought that UK would indeed leave the European Union, unfettered, on 29 March 2019. Today, I’m not so sure. Indeed, I’m rapidly coming around to the notion that there’s a very real chance that the UK will remain tethered to the European Union in some shape or form: either as a full member (Brexit is cancelled), or with some half-baked associate status, ie BRINO. In this context, I fear that our politicians are right now scheming to put their EU Referendum II to the electorate. It would sicken me if this came to pass, but I’m what’s known in psychology circles as a ‘Defensive Pessimist’. I look at every situation in which I find myself and ask two questions: ‘What could possibly go wrong here, and how do I mitigate the effects of things going wrong?‘ From my Leave perspective, EU Referendum II would mean that things had gone horribly wrong. A second referendum would signal above all else that democracy was collapsing in the UK, if it hasn’t collapsed already, looking at the extraordinary antics of our ruling elites this past 2 years and more. A second referendum would signal that the culture of the European Union had indeed infected totally our British political institutions. The EU way is to arrange matters such that if a member nation conducts a referendum and comes up with the wrong result, the people must vote again. Denmark was required to vote again on the Maastricht Treaty; Ireland was required to vote again twice: first on the Nice Treaty and then again on the Lisbon Treaty. As José Manuel Barosso, erstwhile President of the European Commission once said, ‘They must go on voting until they get it right‘. Unbridled arrogance, I’d say. An Appeal to Remain Voters The point is that if our politicians succeed in engineering EU Referendum II, what are we supposed to do? Regardless of which way you voted in the EU Referendum, how would you react to being invited to vote again? For you can be sure that EU Referendum II would be constructed to make a Remain outcome a racing certainty, either in the way that the question was framed, or how the debate was controlled (rigged), or both. This is the way that the European Union works, bearing in mind that the overwhelming majorities of the British political class and the establishment are, to all intents and purposes, agents of the European Union; they make no secret of this fact for much of the time. If you throw in the state broadcaster’s bias towards the joys of EU membership (check out News-watch if you’re sceptical about the BBC’s pro-EU bias), then those of us who would like to see the UK leave the European Union would deliberately be heavily outgunned in EU Referendum II. Reflecting the overall profile of voting in the EU Referendum, I would say that roughly half of my wider family and friends voted Leave, whilst the other half voted Remain. That said, recently a number of my Remain-voting acquaintances have let it be known to me that perhaps being in favour of having the UK governed by a foreign power wasn’t such a great idea after all. We’ve come to see the EU in its true colours over the past couple of years, and we’ve discovered that those colours are more pirate-like Jolly Roger than United Colours of Benetton. So, here’s my appeal. If you voted Remain in the EU Referendum and are invited to vote again in EU Referendum II, please give serious consideration to placing your cross in whichever box is most likely to result in the UK regaining its sovereignty. Bear in mind that the power brokers in the European Union are on an avowed mission to create a United States of Europe (‘ever closer union’); to emasculate member states and centralise EU power in the European Commission; to have EU foreign policy take precedence over member nations’ foreign policies; following on from that, to form a European Union Army [PESCO] to enforce EU foreign policy, inimical to NATO, the preserver of peace in Europe since NATO was formed in 1949; to set tax policies across all member states – a policy of taxation without representation; generally to convert sovereign nation states into mere regions of the United States of Europe. It was the Conservative MP Ken Clarke who said, ‘I look forward to the day when the Westminster Parliament is just a council chamber in Europe‘. An Existential Crisis I hope you can you see that the apparently simple question of whether or not the UK should be a member of what was purported to be a trading bloc, is now in fact an existential crisis for the British people. The European Union absolutely is not a trading bloc. That was the original seductive intention when the European Coal and Steel Community was formed in 1951. Today, however, the European Union is a nascent empire without a demos. In other words, the 500 million people who make up the European Union have no allegiance to the European Union at all. They buy into it primarily, if not solely, for economic reasons. That was always the intention of the founding fathers, led by the Frenchman Jean Monnet who said, as long ago as April 1952, that: ‘Europe’s nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people realising what is happening. This can be achieved by successive steps, each disguised as having some ‘economic’ purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to ‘federation’ If you want your country, the United Kingdom, to become nothing more than a ‘region’ of a single European state governed by unelected, unaccountable people like Jean-Claude Juncker and Donald Tusk, then if EU Referendum II comes to pass, by all means vote Remain. However, if you value everything that the United Kingdom stands for, I appeal to you to vote for the option which will ensure the recovery of our national sovereignty – a precious gem bequeathed to us by generations of blood, treasure and sacrifice. |
Those of us who understand what is written here are already working hard to ensure a permanent change for the better in our method of government. Please refer to:
www.theharrogateagenda.org.uk
where our SIX DEMANDS for a total reorganisation of UK government are set out. If you care to download and peruse the ‘FLEXCIT’ publication (a pdf 400 pages long, but well worth the time ) or contact us via ‘info@theharrogateagenda.org.uk’ for a copy of the synopsis version entitled ‘The Market Solution’.
With once again a hat-tip to our contributor ‘moraymint’